Предраг Ж. Живковић, Универзитет у Крагујевцу, Факултет педагошких наука у Јагодини, имејл: predrag.zivkovic@pefja.kg.ac.rs
Иновације у настави, XXXII, 2019/3, стр. 107–116

| PDF | | Extended summary PDF |
doi: 10.5937/inovacije1903107Z

Резиме: Циљ рада је логистичком регресијом утврдити предиктивне и класификационе вредности тродимензионалног Беијардовог модела професионалног идентитета наставника (наставник као стручњак за наставни предмет и научну област, наставник дидактичар експерт и наставник педагог експерт). Предикторске варијабле у провери су пол наставника, дужина радног стажа, искуство у другој професији и наставна област. Логистичка регресија у провери овог модела није досад рађена. Најважнији резултати истраживања су: изабрани скуп предикторских варијабли за сваки елемент критеријумске варијабле даје у моделу добре резултате; збирни показатељи перформанси модела су у захтеваним границама; модел класификује задовољавајући проценат случајева за сва три елемента модела професионалног идентитета.

Кључне речи: професионални идентитет наставника, модел, логистичка регресија, Д. Беијард.

Summary: The aim of the research is to use logistic regression to determine the predictive and classification values of the three-dimensional Beijaard’s model of teachers’ professional identity (teachers as subjectmatter experts, didactical experts, and pedagogical experts). Logistic regression as an analyticalstatistical procedure for testing this model has not been done so far. The most important results of the research are as follows: the selected set of predictor variables for each element of the criterion variable gives good results in the model; the aggregate performance indicators of the model are within the required limits; the model classifies a satisfactory percentage of cases for all three elements of the professional identity model.

Keywords: teachers’ professional identity, model, logistic regression, Douwe Beijaard.

Литература

• Akkerman, S. F. & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education. 27, 308–319. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013.
• Beauchamp, C. & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education. 39 (2), 175‒189. DOI: 10.1080/03057640902902252.
• Beijaard, D. (1995). Teachers’ prior experiences and actual perceptions of professional identity. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 1, 281–294.
• Beijaard, D. & De Vries, Y. (1997). Building expertise: A process perspective on the development or change of teachers beliefs. European Journal of Teacher Education. 20, 243‒255. DOI: 10.1080/0261976970200304.
•  Beijaard, D., Verloop, N. & Vermunt, J. D. (2000a). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education. 16, 749–764. DOI: 1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8.
• Beijaard, D., Paulien, C. M. & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education. 20, 107–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.
• Bennett, N. & Carre, H. J. C. (1993). Learning to teach. London: Routledge.
• Bromme, R. (1991). Wissenstypen und professionelles Selbstverstandniss [Types of knowledge and professional self-concept]. Zeitschrift fur Paidagogik. 37, 769–785.
• Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In: Berliner, D. C. & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.). Handbook  of educational psychology (709–725). New York: Macmillan.
• Coldron, J. & Smith, R. (1999). Active location in teachers’ construction of their professional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 31 (6), 711‒726. doi.org/10.1080/002202799182954
• Day, C. & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers (teacher quality and school development). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9780203847909.
• Fenstermacher, G. D. (1992). The concepts of method and manner in teaching. In: Oser, F. K., Dick, A. & Patry, J. L. (Eds.). Effective and responsible teaching (95–108). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Hoyle, E. & John, P. D. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice. London: Cassell. DOI: 10.2307/3121708.
• Ibarra, H. (1991). Provisional Selves: Experimenting With Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44, 764‒791. DOI:10.2307/2667055.
• Ingvarson, L. & Rowe, K. (2007). Conceptualising and evaluating teacher quality: Substantive and methodological issues. Retrieved June, 2016. from www: http://research.acer.edu.au/learning_ processes/8.. DOI: 10.1177/000494410805200102.
• Lalić Vučetić, N. (2016). Mogućnost razvijanja motivacija za učenje: perspektive nastavnika i učenika. Inovacije u nastavi. XXIX, 2016/1, 1‒15. DOI: 10.5973/inovacije1601001L.
• Lim, D. H. & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society. 12, 282–293. Retrived September, 2017 from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.282.
• Lindström, L. (2011). The multiple faces of visual arts education. International Journal of Art and Design Education. 30, 7–17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01688.x.
• Löfström, E., Anspal, T., Hannula, M. S. & Poom-Valickis, K. (2010). Metaphors About ’The Teacher’: Gendered, Discipline-Specific and Persistent? In: Mikk, J., Veisson, M. & Luik, P. (Eds.). Teacher’s Personality and Professionalism. Estonian studies in Education (105‒122). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishers House.
• McIntyre, D. J. Byrd, D. M. & Fox, S. M. (1996). Field and laboratory experiences. In: Sikula, J. (Ed.). Handbook of research on teacher education (171–193). New York: Macmillan.
• Mukumbang, F. C. & Alindekane, L. M. (2017). Student nurse- educators’ construction of teacher identity from a self- evaluation perspective: A quantitative case study. Nursing Open. 4, 108–115. doi.org/10.1002/nop2.75.
• Olsen, B. (2010). Teaching for success. Developing your teacher identity in today’s classroom. Boulder/London: Paradigm Publishers. DOI: 10.4324/9781315638621.
• Özmen, K. S. (2010). Fostering nonverbal immediacy and teacher identity of English teacher trainees. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 35, 1–23. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2010v35n6.1.
• Olmez, F. (2016). An insight into professional identities of Turkish EFL instructors. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research Online. 2 (4), 1226‒1235. Retrieved April, 2018 from www: http://dergipark.gov.tr/ijsser doi: 10.24289/ijsser.278998.
• Oser, F. K. (1992). Morality in professional action: A discourse approach for teaching. Review of Research in Education. 20 (1), 57‒127. DOI: 10.3102/0091732X020001057.
• Pallant, J. (2011). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS program survival manual (4th edn). London: Allen & Unwin.
• Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2011). Constructing practical knowledge of teaching: Eleven newly qualified language teachers’ discursive agency. Language Learning Journal. 39, 365–380. DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2010.544750.
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform. Harvard Educational Review. 57, 1–22. DOI: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
• Smit, B. & Fritz, E. (2008). Understanding teacher identity from a symbolic interactionist perspective: Two ethnographic narratives. South African Journal of Education. 28, 91–101.
• Van Manen, M. (1999). The Tact of Teaching. Toronto: Althouse Press.
• Volkmann, M. J. & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Creating professional identity: Dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher. Science Education. 82 (3), 293–310. doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3%3C293::AID-SCE1%3E3.0.CO;2-7.
• Vranješević, J. & Živković, N. V. (2013). Teachers’ professional identity and education between competencies and ideals. Teme: Časopis za društvene nauke. 37 (2), 581–594.
• Wanekezi, A. U., Okoli, J. & Mezieobi, S. A. (2011). Attitude of student- teachers towards teaching practice in the University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies. 2, 41–46.
• Wilhelm, M., Brovelli, D., Rehm, M. & Kauertz, A. (2010). Professional identity and competence in science teaching among student teachers. In: Taşar, M. F. & Çakmakcı, G. (Eds.). Contemporary science education research: Pre-service and in-service teacher education (9–15). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
• Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. 34 (3), 3–9.
• Živković, P. (2012). Profesionalni identitet nastavnika i samoprocena kvaliteta rada. Jagodina: Kairos.
• Živković, P. (2016). Profesionalni identitet i kvalitet rada nastavnika: korelaciona analiza. U: Teodorović, J. (ur.). Zbornik radova Unapređivanje kvaliteta obrazovanja u osnovnim školama (176‒189). Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja ‒ Zavod za unapređivanje obrazovanja i vaspitanja; Jagodina: Fakultet pedagoških nauka Univerziteta u Kragujevcu.

Copyright © 2019 by the authors, licensee Teacher Education Faculty University of Belgrade, SERBIA. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original paper is accurately cited.